When Reformed Evangelicals disagree on contemporary secular movements and theories: Conclusions

The travels of this series began by bemoaning how Reformed Evangelicals have disagreed with each other over contemporary secular movements and theories, with CRT as a touch point. The various parties might consider the heat in their words coming from a desire to either protect or promote the gospel. After all, if anything is worth a fight, it’s for and over the good news of Jesus, right?

When Reformed Evangelicals disagree on contemporary secular movements and theories: Camp B

Camp B: exhorting love of neighbour But first, we bring you an important announcement… The title of this series is, ‘When Reformed Evangelicals disagree on contemporary secular movements and theories’. That may communicate that with something like CRT, Camp A says ‘No’ to it, while Camp B says ‘Yes’. However, I don’t mean that! So, apologies if the title is misleading. Instead, as I see it in terms of Camp B, they’re not giving an indiscriminate ‘yes’. Instead, what I’m hearing most times is: "Yes there are significant issues with CRT, but at the end of the day, we don’t think CRT is the primary issue or what we should be talking about. We think we need to keep moving the conversation and actions along to ways in which we can talk about past injustice and present issues as we try to better love and serve the people around us with and from the good news of Jesus."